I am quite flattered by the publicity that I am getting because of my posts! Thank you.
Now, it seems that my posts are understood to be objections to peoples' rules: this is decidedly not the case, far from it. In my posts I do not criticize peoples' profiles or rules, but rant against the apparent prevalent attitude among SOME couples, that single men are lapdogs that would just be too happy to jump at the beg and call of any couple and that they have no place in the swinging fraternity in their own right. One couple actually went as far as stating that single men are only "allowed" in the swinging fraternity because some couples want a third.
If everyone has the right to play the game as they feel comfortable, why are single men singled out (pun intended) as rogues, as another couple put it?
It will also be noticed that my posts are in response to ADVERTISEMENTS, not to profiles per se. When one places an advertisement, one explicitly invites responses and those responses might very often not be what one expects. If one then gets upset by such response, well then, is one being defined by the opinion of some arbitrary stranger?
Just as a last remark, back to the plight of single men, consider the economic viability of this site had it had no single men....