Join the most popular community of South African swingers now
Login

Discussion: What is "well-endowed"?

last reply
10 replies
1.8k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Unknown User
I am just wondering what is considerd well endowed and how woud you go about determing if you are. Doesnt it depend on your partner aswell
ash
Sexpert
i dont suppose there is a right answer but i would say anything below 20cm would be a wrong answer.
Unknown User
I honestly don't have an answer for this but I think it's important to note that there cannot be a one measurement answer here (@ash), length cannot not be the only aspect in the mix. A long narrow member would not be automatically be considered "large endowment" simply because of the more than average length alone. Girth is definitely a factor in the equation.
Voyer1105
Orgasminator
I would say at least 16 cm and very thick
Unknown User
im defiantly out of the running on this one
Unknown User
I would imagine that logic dictates that both ends of the spectrum would be smaller percentages than those who feature around the "average" part of the graph.
Unknown User
So it would appear that lenthwise between 16 and 20 cm and thick So now the question is what would be considerd thick. I have heard that womens v viginas differ in size aswell so if this is correct what would feel thick for one women Would be thin to the next
Voyer1105
Orgasminator
Thick is when you cannot get your hand around or fit it in your mouth
Unknown User
Quote by Voyer1105
Thick is when you cannot get your hand around or fit it in your mouth

HEH heh heh... indeed..
altydluzz
Warming the Bed
Quote by LeeEC
Thick is when you cannot get your hand around or fit it in your mouth

HEH heh heh... indeed..
Hehehehe. And then there's the matter of big and small hands...
SDM
Sex God
There is much written about size and technique, with lots about positions for average or slightly smaller guy's, now this is all good and well, but do the authors not realise that the guy's who are above average or slightly bigger are also using these techniques???? so . . . . . . . . . . . .