Join the most popular community of South African swingers now
Login

bukkake

last reply
15 replies
2.6k views
1 watcher
0 likes
who has been part of a bukkake group experience here?
I must say that I have been fortunate enough to be involved in 3 bukkake sessions. We were 6 guys on each occasion.
Personally it's not for me but, I'd like to know. With all this free flowing semen, do guys get tested? How does it work? And if they do get tested, what if it's in the 6month window- where they might not be healthy?. Can the chick like take on too much? Can something happen? Lol sorry curious...
I would think without a doubt there's definitely risk. Mainly because of the unpredictability of the situation. Eyes, nose, mouth. . All a problem. .. body less risk. .. but I imagine in a situation like this there's bound to be one twit who doesn't follow the agreed upon rules and that doubles the risk whatever it might be. Yeah not my idea of fun even without the risk. Demeaning. Degrading. .. Only how I would feel of course. . I'm not everyone and I'm sure there are women or there who would find it hot... I'm just not one of them.
It always fascinates me with topics such as this one and even the likes of "Dogging" how many views the posts get. Hundreds and hundreds . . . . . with only a few replies. That in it itself, speaks volumes.
Personally i don't see the turn on, 6 guys spraying you in cum and then the next day it's pink eye because one guy scored a bullseye of the wrong place. A gangbang bang is hot, you see all the action and get to fuck her but bukkake is just too porno style for me. Personally I feel if she wants to be used and abused then call PiB with her rope and blindfolds.
Quote by SDMR
It always fascinates me with topics such as this one and even the likes of "Dogging" how many views the posts get. Hundreds and hundreds . . . . . with only a few replies. That in it itself, speaks volumes.

Hi SDMR, well I would be one of the "viewers" (of the post), irrespective of the subject matter (but particularly of the Dogging posts! wink ). I read every one of the forum posts routinely, and yet you know how seldom I comment or respond...
I agree with most of the posters here, that bukake is not my scene - nearly had an opportunity to be involved in one once, but it seemed to fizzle out and never happened (or else I was left out??!!)
But although I am not that keen on bukake, nor will I tell you what I do for a living, and I am not really into kink other than voyeurism and dogging, and I KNOW that there are lots of single males with really poor manners, I still like to know what's going on, and am one of the avid devourers (rather than a producer) of the written word here in these pages... Until posts get acrimonious, that is!
Quote by redbruce
It always fascinates me with topics such as this one and even the likes of "Dogging" how many views the posts get. Hundreds and hundreds . . . . . with only a few replies. That in it itself, speaks volumes.

Hi SDMR, well I would be one of the "viewers" (of the post), irrespective of the subject matter (but particularly of the Dogging posts! wink ). I read every one of the forum posts routinely, and yet you know how seldom I comment or respond...
I agree with most of the posters here, that bukake is not my scene - nearly had an opportunity to be involved in one once, but it seemed to fizzle out and never happened (or else I was left out??!!)
But although I am not that keen on bukake, nor will I tell you what I do for a living, and I am not really into kink other than voyeurism and dogging, and I KNOW that there are lots of single males with really poor manners, I still like to know what's going on, and am one of the avid devourers (rather than a producer) of the written word here in these pages... Until posts get acrimonious, that is!
you misunderstand my comments Mr Redbruce . . . .
What I am highlighting (as per my own observations) is that the heading of the thread seems to determine the "number of views" The more "out there" the heading, the more views, so in my own deduction that would possibly indicate what the majority of people (who peruse the forums) are actually interested in.
Quote by SDMR
It always fascinates me with topics such as this one and even the likes of "Dogging" how many views the posts get. Hundreds and hundreds . . . . . with only a few replies. That in it itself, speaks volumes.

Hi SDMR, well I would be one of the "viewers" (of the post), irrespective of the subject matter (but particularly of the Dogging posts! wink ). I read every one of the forum posts routinely, and yet you know how seldom I comment or respond...
I agree with most of the posters here, that bukake is not my scene - nearly had an opportunity to be involved in one once, but it seemed to fizzle out and never happened (or else I was left out??!!)
But although I am not that keen on bukake, nor will I tell you what I do for a living, and I am not really into kink other than voyeurism and dogging, and I KNOW that there are lots of single males with really poor manners, I still like to know what's going on, and am one of the avid devourers (rather than a producer) of the written word here in these pages... Until posts get acrimonious, that is!
you misunderstand my comments Mr Redbruce . . . .
What I am highlighting (as per my own observations) is that the heading of the thread seems to determine the "number of views" The more "out there" the heading, the more views, so in my own deduction that would possibly indicate what the majority of people (who peruse the forums) are actually interested in.
The more 'out there', be it bizarre, perceived kink/degenerate, obscene, gory, bloody, horrific etc the more people will, at the very least, take a quick peek to satisfy their curiosity. A nice example is accidents, the worse it looks the more people cluster together to get a better view, the more bloody the front page photo of a news paper the higher the circulation. We have in essence not moved on much since the days of watching people fight off lions in the Colosseum.
The irony is that most people would deny looking or being curious, they will also criticize those that do (themselves without admission) but would happily and enthusiastically spam you with you tube clips of some hapless drunk falling in front of a truck/train/into a sawmill etc.
Quote by playcouple
The more 'out there', be it bizarre, perceived kink/degenerate, obscene, gory, bloody, horrific etc the more people will, at the very least, take a quick peek to satisfy their curiosity. A nice example is accidents, the worse it looks the more people cluster together to get a better view, the more bloody the front page photo of a news paper the higher the circulation. We have in essence not moved on much since the days of watching people fight off lions in the Colosseum.
The irony is that most people would deny looking or being curious, they will also criticize those that do (themselves without admission) but would happily and enthusiastically spam you with you tube clips of some hapless drunk falling in front of a truck/train/into a sawmill etc.

Indeed, and in my observations . . .. oh wait, giving your own observations in frowned upon. wink
Quote by SDMR
you misunderstand my comments Mr Redbruce . . . .
What I am highlighting (as per my own observations) is that the heading of the thread seems to determine the "number of views" The more "out there" the heading, the more views, so in my own deduction that would possibly indicate what the majority of people (who peruse the forums) are actually interested in.

SDMR, it's not that I misunderstood - was making the comment that I am one of those strange people who, IRRESPECTIVE of the topic, will read ALL the posts just to see what is being said. But I fully concur with you and playcouple - the more bizzare / kinky the topic, the more likely the subject is to attract attention for the casual "wonder what THIS is about?" viewers who might not take the time to look at the more "regular" stuff...
For an insight as to why this may appeal to the male mind, read the book "Sex at dawn ..." which examines human sexual behavior in prehistory, can't see how it can be much fun for the lady besides the multi-male attention thing, or maybe she has a 'glazed doughnut' fetish !? Also note that this started in Japan, where vending machines dispense pre-worn ladies panties, need I say more?
One woman's laundry is another man's fetish. ...
Quote by LeeEC
One woman's laundry is another man's fetish. ...

Hmmm, I know that one
Dirty laundry huh?? I once was offered some MONEY for my dirty panties....ewwww, but thaaaaattttt is most certainly NOT one of my kinks. I so REFUSE to wear panties for more than one day!!!!!!! That is, my panties do not smell of anything......I did smell them by the way, to see what the attraction might be, I can only think panties might get smelly after say 3 days of solid wearing......yuck.....